Chicago Modernism: Another View

(photo by Lee Bey)
The story of architectural modernism is often told in simple strokes: Mies van der Rohe, SOM, Mies and more Mies. But the city offered so much more---good stuff, too---even by lesser-known modernists.
The 21-story 320 W. Oakdale by architect Milton Schwartz is a sterling example. Built for $2 million, this residential tower was a bit of a revelation when it was completed in 1954. Its overhanging, exposed concrete floor slabs and horizontal bands of floor-to-ceiling window differed from the dark, steel-and-glass-tower model established by Mies' 860-880 Lake Shore Drive. Visually, the building appeared weightless at night as darkness reduced the tower's profile to streams of light shining out from its 57 units.
The tower took on a bit of infamy in 1960 when it was reportered mob underboss Frank "Strongy" Ferraro lived there. The overhangs were "concrete eyebrows [that] protected him from undue exposure," the Chicago Tribune quipped. Schwartz himself had a nice run in the 1950s and 1960s, designing what is now Hotel 71 at 71 E. Wacker in 1957; a modernist home in the city's Chatham neighborhood for Dr. Earl Renfroe, an African American orthodontist; and buildings in Philadelphia and Las Vegas. Schwartz also oversaw the interior restoration of a Louis Sullivan-designed residence at 2147 N. Cleveland in 1960.
Comments
Glad you've highlighted this Milton Schwartz building. Along with St. Joe Hospital (Belli & Belli) and Commonwealth Plaza (Mies), this trio of proximate buildings is one of the best collections of 50s-60s buildings in the city.
Posted by: Jim Peters | September 21, 2007 10:49 AM
I love this building, and its near twin on Sheridan just north of Hollywood. I also like Schwartz's building on the northeast corner of Sheridan and Bryn Mawr.
Posted by: Phil Berger | November 5, 2007 12:16 AM
What a glorious photo Mr. Bey. I hope that this building will be better cared for in the future. Is there an idea to offer protection for St. Joseph, Commonwealth Plaza and the above? The 50s-60s seems to be quite a stretch for many people...
Posted by: Shirley Weese Young | November 5, 2007 05:35 PM